Sixty-Six Crosby Associates v. Berger & Kramer, L. L. P.

256 A.D.2d 26, 680 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1998·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered June 3, 1998, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly denied the motion to compel plaintiffs to answer a second set of interrogatories since summary denial of such a motion is mandated when it is made without a proper affirmation of good faith as required by 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) (see, Vasquez v G.A.P.L.W. Realty, 236 AD2d 311; Matos v Mira Realty Mgt. Corp., 240 AD2d 214). Concur— Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sixty-Six Crosby Associates v. Berger & Kramer, L. L. P., 256 A.D.2d 26, 680 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 26 (Sixty-Six Crosby Associates v. Berger & Kramer, L. L. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunlop Development Corp. v. Spitzer
26 A.D.3d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pandolf v. American International Group, Inc.
16 A.D.3d 315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Gordon v. Hancock
292 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Rothlein v. W.W. Norton & Co.
185 Misc. 2d 66 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
Nikpour v. City of New York
179 Misc. 2d 928 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)