Gordon v. Hancock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gordon v. Hancock

292 A.D.2d 858, 738 N.Y.S.2d 914

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 A.D.2d 858 (Gordon v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon v. Hancock, 292 A.D.2d 858, 738 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Galloway, J.), entered August 10, 2001, that granted defendants’ cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the cross motion is denied.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendants’ cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition. Defendants’ failure to comply with 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) requires denial of the cross motion (see, Barnes v NYNEX, Inc., 274 AD2d 368; Sixty-Six Crosby Assoc. v Berger & Kramer, 256 AD2d 26; Vasquez v G.A.P.L.W. Realty, 236 AD2d 311, 312; Romero v Korn, 236 AD2d 598; Koelbl v Harvey, 176 AD2d [859]*8591040). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hayes, Hurlbutt and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Galloway, J.), entered August 10, 2001, that granted defendants’ cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the cross motion is denied.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendants’ cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition. Defendants’ failure to comply with 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) requires denial of the cross motion (see, Barnes v NYNEX, Inc., 274 AD2d 368; Sixty-Six Crosby Assoc. v Berger & Kramer, 256 AD2d 26; Vasquez v G.A.P.L.W. Realty, 236 AD2d 311, 312; Romero v Korn, 236 AD2d 598; Koelbl v Harvey, 176 AD2d [859]*8591040). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hayes, Hurlbutt and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 858, 738 N.Y.S.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-hancock-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack