Gordon v. Hancock

292 A.D.2d 858, 738 N.Y.S.2d 914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Galloway, J.), entered August 10, 2001, that granted defendants’ cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the cross motion is denied.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendants’ cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition. Defendants’ failure to comply with 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) requires denial of the cross motion (see, Barnes v NYNEX, Inc., 274 AD2d 368; Sixty-Six Crosby Assoc. v Berger & Kramer, 256 AD2d 26; Vasquez v G.A.P.L.W. Realty, 236 AD2d 311, 312; Romero v Korn, 236 AD2d 598; Koelbl v Harvey, 176 AD2d [859]*8591040). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hayes, Hurlbutt and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. Hancock, 292 A.D.2d 858, 738 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 858 (Gordon v. Hancock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kane v. Shapiro, Rosenbaum, Liebschutz, & Nelson, L.L.P.
57 A.D.3d 1513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)