Sitler v. Sitler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sitler v. Sitler

251 A.D.2d 319, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6226

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 319 (Sitler v. Sitler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sitler v. Sitler, 251 A.D.2d 319, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.; Henry, J., at trial), entered April 1, 1997, which, inter alia, awarded her maintenance in the amount of only $500 per month for five years, and then $300 per month for an additional five-year period, and directed the defendant husband to provide her with health and medical insurance for only five years.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, an award of lifetime maintenance is not appropriate under these circumstances (see, Liadis v Liadis, 207 AD2d 331; cf., Borra v Borra, 218 AD2d 780).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.; Henry, J., at trial), entered April 1, 1997, which, inter alia, awarded her maintenance in the amount of only $500 per month for five years, and then $300 per month for an additional five-year period, and directed the defendant husband to provide her with health and medical insurance for only five years.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contentions, an award of lifetime maintenance is not appropriate under these circumstances (see, Liadis v Liadis, 207 AD2d 331; cf., Borra v Borra, 218 AD2d 780).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 319, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sitler-v-sitler-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack