Porter v. Porter

288 A.D.2d 363, 733 N.Y.S.2d 636, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11248

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated July 5, 2000, as terminated the defendant’s obligation to pay maintenance, and denied her request for an award of an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, an award of lifetime maintenance is not appropriate under these circumstances (see, Sitler v Sitter, 251 AD2d 319; Liadis v Liadis, 207 AD2d 331; cf., Borra v Borra, 218 AD2d 780).

The plaintiffs request for an award of an attorneys fee was properly denied (see, Kayden v Kayden, 278 AD2d 202). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. Porter, 288 A.D.2d 363, 733 N.Y.S.2d 636, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 363 (Porter v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liadis v. Liadis
207 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Borra v. Borra
218 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Sitler v. Sitler
251 A.D.2d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Kayden v. Kayden
278 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)