Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp)

Nevada Supreme Court

Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp)

DecidedJuly 27, 2015

Docket64475

StatusUnpublished

This text of Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp) (Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp), (Neb. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

existed for filing the underlying complaint, we conclude that petitioner has demonstrated that our intervention is warranted. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition GRANTED AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS instructing the district court to vacate its September 11, 2012, order and its September 6, 2013, judgment to the extent that those orders imposed sanctions against petitioner.

A- 44-% , C.J. Hardesty

Parraguirre

Saitta

Poday , J. Gibbons Pickering

cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Kenneth Dale Sisco Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

existed for filing the underlying complaint, we conclude that petitioner has demonstrated that our intervention is warranted. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition GRANTED AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS instructing the district court to vacate its September 11, 2012, order and its September 6, 2013, judgment to the extent that those orders imposed sanctions against petitioner.