Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp)
Opinion
demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered the parties' arguments, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 679, 818 P.2d at 851, 853; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbons
cee--att , J. ickering Hardesty
, J. Parraguirre Douglas
, J. Cherry Kitta
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Kenneth Dale Sisco Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA
(0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp) (Sisco v. Dist. Ct. (Sharp)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.