Sirota v. Sirota
This text of 168 Misc. 2d 123 (Sirota v. Sirota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified by striking the part thereof which transferred the proceedings to the Supreme Court, and, as so modified, affirmed without costs.
[124]*124The Civil Court does not have the authority to transfer to the Supreme Court matters over which it has jurisdiction (see, NY Const, art VI, § 19). Applications for such relief should be made directly to the Supreme Court (see, CPLR 325). As to the counterclaims and affirmative defenses, we agree with the court below that there is no basis for the dismissal thereof.
Kassoff, P. J., Scholnick and Chetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 Misc. 2d 123, 644 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1996 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sirota-v-sirota-nyappterm-1996.