Singletary v. Hardemon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Singletary v. Hardemon

595 So. 2d 277, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1992 WL 48837

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 17, 1992

DocketNo. 92-55

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 595 So. 2d 277 (Singletary v. Hardemon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So. 2d 277, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1992 WL 48837 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this Petition for Certiorari we are called upon to review the propriety of an ex parte order entered December 11, 1991, providing for a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) test in a paternity action which was concluded by a final, order on April 23, 1987. During the proceedings in the trial court, the respondent had been offered two opportunities to secure such a test, but declined such. We therefore find that the order of December 11, 1992, ordering such a test, departs from the essential requirements of the law, and we quash same. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Sadiki, 561 So.2d 304 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By this Petition for Certiorari we are called upon to review the propriety of an ex parte order entered December 11, 1991, providing for a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) test in a paternity action which was concluded by a final, order on April 23, 1987. During the proceedings in the trial court, the respondent had been offered two opportunities to secure such a test, but declined such. We therefore find that the order of December 11, 1992, ordering such a test, departs from the essential requirements of the law, and we quash same. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Sadiki, 561 So.2d 304 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Order quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 So. 2d 277, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3302, 1992 WL 48837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singletary-v-hardemon-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack