Pelella v. Pelella
This text of 604 So. 2d 14 (Pelella v. Pelella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
604 So. 2d 14, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9077, 1992 WL 191608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelella-v-pelella-fladistctapp-1992.