Pelella v. Pelella

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pelella v. Pelella

604 So. 2d 14, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9077, 1992 WL 191608

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 1992·No. No. 91-2931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is res judicata and, therefore, bars any redetermination of the paternity of the child. See Singletary v. Hardemon, 595 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Vereen v. Vereen, 581 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Biddle v. Salozzo, 522 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Narcisi v. Brusko, 510 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Hess v. Hess, 466 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985); Decker v. Hunter, 460 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Van Nostrand v. Olivieri, 427 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Pelella v. Pelella, 604 So. 2d 14, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9077, 1992 WL 191608 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

604 So. 2d 14 (Pelella v. Pelella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related