Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Cust. Ct. 60
United States Customs Court·Decided September 14, 1956·No. Reap. Dec. 8644; Entry No. 802619·Published

Opinion

Lawkence, Judge:

Plaintiff, by this appeal for a reappraisement raises the question of the proper dutiable value of certain sewing-machine lights and lamps imported from Canada.

By stipulation of the parties hereto, it has been agreed that there was no foreign, export, or United States value for such or similar merchandise and that the costs of production for such merchandise were the unit invoice prices, plus an additional 8 per centum for profit, plus the costs of packing.

[503]*503Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the sewing-machine lights and lamps in issue, and that said value is the unit invoice prices, plus an additional 8 per centum for profit, plus the costs of packing.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 502 (cusc 1956).

37 Cust. Ct. 502 (Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related