Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 329

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 25, 1956

DocketNo. 59680; protest 256217-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 329 (Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 329 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the protest was called for trial, counsel for the defendant called the court’s attention to certain statements made by certain customs officers in the papers accompanying the protest and entry when forwarded to the court by the collector. Based upon those statements, the defendant conceded the error of the collector’s classification and the correctness of plaintiff’s claim. The claim of the plaintiff was, therefore, sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the protest was called for trial, counsel for the defendant called the court’s attention to certain statements made by certain customs officers in the papers accompanying the protest and entry when forwarded to the court by the collector. Based upon those statements, the defendant conceded the error of the collector’s classification and the correctness of plaintiff’s claim. The claim of the plaintiff was, therefore, sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-manufacturing-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.