Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 329

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Cust. Ct. 60 →

United States Customs Court·Decided January 25, 1956·No. No. 59680; protest 256217-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the protest was called for trial, counsel for the defendant called the court’s attention to certain statements made by certain customs officers in the papers accompanying the protest and entry when forwarded to the court by the collector. Based upon those statements, the defendant conceded the error of the collector’s classification and the correctness of plaintiff’s claim. The claim of the plaintiff was, therefore, sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the protest was called for trial, counsel for the defendant called the court’s attention to certain statements made by certain customs officers in the papers accompanying the protest and entry when forwarded to the court by the collector. Based upon those statements, the defendant conceded the error of the collector’s classification and the correctness of plaintiff’s claim. The claim of the plaintiff was, therefore, sustained.

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 329 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 329 (Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.