SINEUS v. State
301 S.W.3d 525, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1632, 2009 WL 4034938
Opinion
ORDER
Moliere Sineus appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SINEUS v. State, 301 S.W.3d 525, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1632, 2009 WL 4034938 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
301 S.W.3d 525 (SINEUS v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mahan v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City
301 S.W.3d 525 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)