SINEUS v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

SINEUS v. State

301 S.W.3d 525, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1632, 2009 WL 4034938

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 2009

DocketWD 70119

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 S.W.3d 525 (SINEUS v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SINEUS v. State, 301 S.W.3d 525, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1632, 2009 WL 4034938 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Moliere Sineus appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Moliere Sineus appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.W.3d 525, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1632, 2009 WL 4034938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sineus-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack