Mahan v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City
301 S.W.3d 525, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1637
Opinion
ORDER
Joetta Mahan appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing her petition for failure to state a claim. On appeal, Ms. Ma-han claims that the trial court erred in dismissing her petition because she stated claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act for retaliation, sexual harassment, and racial discrimination. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahan v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City, 301 S.W.3d 525, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1637 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
301 S.W.3d 525 (Mahan v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SINEUS v. State
301 S.W.3d 525 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)