Sims v. Sims
This text of 2021 ND 167 (Sims v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 167
Cara Isabelle Sims, Petitioner v. Earl Otis Sims, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20210039
Appeal from the District Court of Ransom County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Earl O. Sims, Jr., self-represented, Morgantown, WV, respondent and appellant. Sims v. Sims No. 20210039
[¶1] Earl Sims appeals from a domestic violence protection order entered against him in December 2020. He argues the evidence presented at the district court hearing did not support the two-year protection order. We conclude the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. See Lindstaedt v. George, 2020 ND 262, ¶¶ 3, 5, 952 N.W.2d 102 (the clearly erroneous standard of review applies to factual findings made by the district court in N.D.C.C. § 14-07.1-02 domestic violence proceedings). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-sims-nd-2021.