Sims v. Sims
This text of 238 S.E.2d 32 (Sims v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary M. Sims appeals the judgment of the trial court entered in her divorce case. We affirm.
1. In her first enumeration of error, the wife claims the court erred in granting the divorce on the irretrievably broken ground by summary judgment. The husband filed an affidavit with his motion for summary judgment, but the wife filed no counter-affidavit. Therefore, it was not error to grant the motion. Code Ann. § 81A-156 (e); Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. Giordano, 231 Ga. 601 (203 SE2d 173) (1974).
2. The trial court properly limited the scope of the evidence presented. We find no error. We need not consider the wife’s claim that the trial court erred in his charge to the jury because she failed to object at the trial, but, even so, we find no error which would require a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 S.E.2d 32, 239 Ga. 451, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-sims-ga-1977.