Sims v. Rea Construction Co.

213 S.E.2d 398, 25 N.C. App. 472, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2295
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedApril 16, 1975
Docket7426SC995
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 213 S.E.2d 398 (Sims v. Rea Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sims v. Rea Construction Co., 213 S.E.2d 398, 25 N.C. App. 472, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2295 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

There is no dispute that plaintiff Bertha G. Sims, the South Carolina administratrix of the estate of Gayheart Alonzo Sims, is not the proper party to maintain the present action. In addition, it was more than two years after the death of Gayheart Alonzo Sims that a North Carolina administrator was appointed and plaintiff sought to substitute the resident administrator as party plaintiff.

The right of action for wrongful death is purely statutory. Graves v. Welborn, 260 N.C. 688, 133 S.E. 2d 761 (1963). In North Carolina, an administrator appointed by the court of another state may not maintain an action for wrongful death occurring in North Carolina. Monfils v. Hazlewood, 218 N.C. 215, 10 S.E. 2d 673 (1940), cert. denied 312 U.S. 684. The commencement of a wrongful death action by a foreign administra tor in North Carolina will not operate to bar the.running of the applicable two-year statute of limitations set forth in G.S. 1-53, such action being a nullity and subject to dismissal. Merchants Distributors v. Hutchinson and Lewis v. Hutchinson, 16 N.C. App. 655, 193 S.E. 2d 436 (1972).

Since no attempt was made to qualify a resident administrator until after expiration of the statute of limitations set forth in G.S. 1-53 (4), substitution of the resident administrator would not relate back and validate the present unauthorized action. Johnson v. Trust Co., 22 N.C. App. 8, 205 S.E. 2d 353 (1974). It follows that the trial court did not err in refusing to substitute the resident administrator as party plaintiff and did not err in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and for dismissal.

Affirmed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.
293 S.E.2d 85 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.
266 S.E.2d 726 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 S.E.2d 398, 25 N.C. App. 472, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-rea-construction-co-ncctapp-1975.