Sims v. City of Seattle
Opinion
1 Honorable Tana Lin
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 ANTHONY SIMS, No. 2:22-CV-00483-TL 9 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 10 v. 11 CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, 12 and ROBERT BROWN, GREGORY NASH, GARRETT FOLLETTE, and BRADLEY 13 RICHARDSON, Officers of the Seattle Police Department, 14 Defendants. 15
17 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal, it is hereby ORDERED that all claims 18 asserted by Plaintiff against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice, without award of fees or 19 costs to any party. This Order does not abrogate the orders of the District Court on summary 20 judgment (see ECF No. 61) or the Ninth Circuit on interlocutory appeal. See Sims v. Brown, No. 21 23-35545, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 10281 (9th Cir. Apr. 29, 2024). 22
23 DATED this 26th day of November, 2024.
24 A 25 Tana Lin 26 United States District Judge 27 1 Submitted by:
2 MacDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS 3
4 By: __/s/ Nathaniel Flack________ 5 Nathaniel Flack, WSBA #58582 Lauren Freidenberg, WSBA #59145 6 NathanielF@mhb.com LaurenF@mhb.com 7 705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500 8 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 622-1604 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10
11 By: _/s/ Jessica Leiser (with permission)__ Jessica Leiser, WSBA # 49349 12 Alexandra Nica, WSBA # 58299 13 Seattle City Attorney’s Office 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2050 14 Seattle, WA 98104 Jessica.Leiser@Seattle.gov 15 Alexandra.Nica@seattle.gov
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sims v. City of Seattle (Sims v. City of Seattle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.