Sims v. Apfel

238 F.3d 597
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2000
Docket98-60126
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 238 F.3d 597 (Sims v. Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sims v. Apfel, 238 F.3d 597 (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________

No. 98-60126 Summary Calendar _______________________

JUATASSA SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi _________________________________________________ November 6, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Juatassa Sims appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits, contending that the

administrative law judge: (1) failed to afford proper weight to a psychologist’s

opinion that she was severely depressed; (2) improperly excluded certain of her

impairments in assessing her residual function capacity; and (3) should have ordered a consultative examination to assess her mental impairments. We affirm. We lack jurisdiction to review Sims’s second and third contentions because they were not raised before the Appeals Council.1 The first contention is without merit

because the ALJ is entitled and expected to determine the credibility of medical

experts and to weigh their opinions accordingly.2 Concluding that the findings of the ALJ are supported by substantial evidence, the judgment appealed is

AFFIRMED.3

1 Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208 (5th Cir. 1994). 2 Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232 (5th Cir. 1994). 3 Villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prince v. Colvin
94 F. Supp. 3d 787 (N.D. Texas, 2015)
Gate Guard Services L.P. v. Perez
14 F. Supp. 3d 825 (S.D. Texas, 2014)
Alonso-Velez v. Commissioner of Social Security
796 F. Supp. 2d 300 (D. Puerto Rico, 2011)
Davidson v. Veneman
317 F.3d 503 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
National Federation of Republican Assemblies v. United States
263 F. Supp. 2d 1372 (S.D. Alabama, 2003)
Branstad v. Veneman
232 F. Supp. 2d 945 (N.D. Iowa, 2002)
Edwards v. Barnhart
214 F. Supp. 2d 700 (W.D. Texas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 F.3d 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-apfel-ca5-2000.