Sims v. Apfel
This text of 238 F.3d 597 (Sims v. Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
______________________
No. 98-60126 Summary Calendar _______________________
JUATASSA SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi _________________________________________________ November 6, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Juatassa Sims appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits, contending that the
administrative law judge: (1) failed to afford proper weight to a psychologist’s
opinion that she was severely depressed; (2) improperly excluded certain of her
impairments in assessing her residual function capacity; and (3) should have ordered a consultative examination to assess her mental impairments. We affirm. We lack jurisdiction to review Sims’s second and third contentions because they were not raised before the Appeals Council.1 The first contention is without merit
because the ALJ is entitled and expected to determine the credibility of medical
experts and to weigh their opinions accordingly.2 Concluding that the findings of the ALJ are supported by substantial evidence, the judgment appealed is
AFFIRMED.3
1 Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208 (5th Cir. 1994). 2 Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232 (5th Cir. 1994). 3 Villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 F.3d 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sims-v-apfel-ca5-2000.