Simpson v. Stein
43 Kan. 35
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The only allegation in the petition in error filed in this court is that “the district court erred in overruling the motion of the defendant below to quash the summons and dismiss the action.” The record does not show any final disposition of the case; therefore there is nothing presented for this court to review. (Brown v. Kimble, 5 Kas. 80; Dolbee v. Hoover, 8 id. 124; Snavely v. Buggy Co., 36 id. 106; Burch v. Adams, 40 id. 639.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simpson v. Stein, 43 Kan. 35 (kan 1890).
43 Kan. 35 (Simpson v. Stein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eastern Kansas Oil Co. v. Beutner
167 P. 1061 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1917)
Consolidated Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Winsor
1914 OK 49 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Consolidated Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Roberts
1914 OK 8 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)