Consolidated Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Winsor
Opinion
The only error assigned in the petition in error in this cause is:
“That there is error in said record and proceeding in this, to wit: That the court erred-in overruling the motion of the plaintiffs in error to dismiss this suit.”
The defendant in error moved to dismiss the proceeding in errar upon the ground that under our statute governing appellate procedure an order overruling a motion to dismiss a cause *363 of action which leaves the case standing for further proceedings is not an appealable order. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The following cases are authority to the effect that an order overruling a motion to quash a.summons, or service, or to dismiss or strike a cause, is not an appealable order: Simpson v. Stein, 43 Kan. 35, 22 Pac. 1020; Simpson v. Kirschbaum & Co., 43 Kan. 36, 22 Pac. 1018; Brown v. Kimble, 5 Kan. 80; Dolbec v. Hoover, 8 Kan. 124; Edenfield v. Barnhart, 5 Kan. 225; Simpson v. Rothchild et al., 43 Kan. 33, 22 Pac. 1019; Kansas Rolling Mill Co. v. Bovard, 34 Kan. 21, 7 Pac. 622. As we borrowed our statute governing appeals from the state of Kansas subsequent to the rendition of' the foregoing cases by its highest court, they are decisive upon the question under consideration. The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1914 OK 49 (Consolidated Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Winsor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.