Simpson v. Department of Revenue
This text of 870 P.2d 824 (Simpson v. Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James and Gloria SIMPSON, Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
*825 Thomas H. Lowrey, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants.
Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
PER CURIAM.
Taxpayers claim that Oregon's taxation of retirement benefits paid by the State of Alaska is unconstitutional, because Oregon exempts its own public retirees' retirement benefits from income tax. Respondent Department of Revenue denied appellants' refund claims for 1985 through 1990. Taxpayers timely appealed to the Oregon Tax Court, which entered a judgment sustaining the department's opinion and order. Appellants appealed to this court. On de novo review, ORS 305.445, we agree with the conclusion of the Tax Court that taxpayers have not advanced any viable legal basis supporting their contentions. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.
The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
870 P.2d 824, 318 Or. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-department-of-revenue-or-1994.