Simons v. Equitec Properties Co.
This text of 380 S.E.2d 90 (Simons v. Equitec Properties Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On August 5, 1988, appellee-landlord filed a dispossessory action, seeking not only possession of the premises but also past due rent. On August 9, 1988, service was made by tacking and mailing. See OCGA § 44-7-51 (a). On August 15, 1988, appellant-tenant mailed his answer to the clerk’s office. On August 17, 1988, appellant’s answer was received in the clerk’s office and filed. On August 19, 1988, even though no default judgment had yet been entered, appellant filed a “Motion To Set Aside Judgment.” On September 8, 1988, the trial court denied appellant’s “motion to set aside judgment or to open default. ...” Appellant brings this direct appeal from the denial of his motion.
Since no default judgment has ever been entered, it is clear that appellant’s motion can only be construed as a motion to open default. “The law distinguishes between a default, which involves an interlocutory matter, and a default judgment, which represents final judicial action and the vesting of rights. [Cits.]” Attridge v. Maines, 174 Ga. App. 472, 473 (330 SE2d 409) (1985). Appellant has not complied with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Compare A. G. Spanos Dev. v. Caras, 170 Ga. App. 243 (316 SE2d 793) (1984). Accordingly, this court has no jurisdiction and the appeal from the denial of appellant’s motion to open default is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
380 S.E.2d 90, 190 Ga. App. 804, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simons-v-equitec-properties-co-gactapp-1989.