Simon v. Zarevich

Michigan Supreme Court

Simon v. Zarevich

181 N.W. 979, 213 Mich. 662, 1921 Mich. LEXIS 608

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 30, 1921

DocketDocket No. 26

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 181 N.W. 979 (Simon v. Zarevich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simon v. Zarevich, 181 N.W. 979, 213 Mich. 662, 1921 Mich. LEXIS 608 (Mich. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.

In this cause, tried without a jury, there are no findings of fact and law. In a colloquy between court and counsel at the conclusion of the trial the court stated his views upon one question in the case but no exception was taken to the opinion announced. There is nothing before us to review. Circuit Court Rule No. 45; sections 12586, 12587, 3 Comp. Laws 1915; Wilson v. Hugus, 163 Mich. 577; Sparling v. Smeltzer, 140 Mich. 461; Kooman v. DeJonge, 186 Mich. 292; Messer v. Dornbus, 210 Mich. 46. And in such cases we cannot examine the testimony to see whether it supports the judgment. See McDonell v. Union Trust Co., 139 Mich. 386, and cases there cited.

The judgment is affirmed.

Steers, C. J., and Moore, Fellows, Stone, Bird, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred. The late Justice Brooke took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.

In this cause, tried without a jury, there are no findings of fact and law. In a colloquy between court and counsel at the conclusion of the trial the court stated his views upon one question in the case but no exception was taken to the opinion announced. There is nothing before us to review. Circuit Court Rule No. 45; sections 12586, 12587, 3 Comp. Laws 1915; Wilson v. Hugus, 163 Mich. 577; Sparling v. Smeltzer, 140 Mich. 461; Kooman v. DeJonge, 186 Mich. 292; Messer v. Dornbus, 210 Mich. 46. And in such cases we cannot examine the testimony to see whether it supports the judgment. See McDonell v. Union Trust Co., 139 Mich. 386, and cases there cited.

The judgment is affirmed.

Steers, C. J., and Moore, Fellows, Stone, Bird, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred. The late Justice Brooke took no part in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 N.W. 979, 213 Mich. 662, 1921 Mich. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simon-v-zarevich-mich-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack