Buitendorp v. Moore

242 Mich. 51
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 1928
DocketDocket No. 90
StatusPublished

This text of 242 Mich. 51 (Buitendorp v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buitendorp v. Moore, 242 Mich. 51 (Mich. 1928).

Opinion

Clark, J.

This action in assumpsit was commenced in justice’s court. The cause was appealed to the circuit court and tried without a jury. Plaintiff had judgment for $27.64. Defendant has brought the case here for review on case-made.

The court made no findings of fact and law and none were requested. There is therefore nothing here to review. McDonell v. Union Trust Co., 139 Mich. 386; Simon v. Zarevich, 213 Mich. 662; Robbins v. Simons Sales Co., 218 Mich. 569; Tuxbury v. Freneh, 39 Mich. 190.

Judgment affirmed.

North, Fellows, Wiest, McDonald, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred. Chief Justice Flannigan and the late Justice Bird took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tuxbury v. French
39 Mich. 190 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)
McDonell v. Union Trust Co.
102 N.W. 953 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
Simon v. Zarevich
181 N.W. 979 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
Robbins v. Simons Sales Co.
188 N.W. 370 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 Mich. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buitendorp-v-moore-mich-1928.