Simon v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 28, 2020·No. 1:12-cv-05209·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DARYL SIMON, Petitioner, ORDER – v. – 12 Civ. 5209 (ER) 07 Crim. 474 (SCR) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

RAMOS, D.J.:

On August 19, 2020, Daryl Simon filed a pro se motion for compassionate release in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Doc. 47.1 On August 28, 2020, the Government opposed.2 07 Crim. 474 Doc. 54. For the reasons set forth below, Simon’s motion for compassionate release is denied. I. Background On May 11, 2006, Simon was arrested following an attempt to buy electronics at a Target store in West Nyack, New York with a fraudulent credit card. 07 Crim. 474 Doc. 32 at 1. When police approached him outside of the store, Simon was running a credit card writing program on his laptop and using a credit card encoding device as he sat inside his car. Id. He was also in possession of four physical credit cards and a data storage device containing 3,200 other credit card numbers. Id. at 1-2. Following his arrest, Simon admitted that he intended to make unauthorized purchases with the credit card numbers and resell them. Id. at 2. On November 15, 2016, Simon was released on bond.

1 Citations are to documents filed on the civil docket unless otherwise noted.

2 �e Government does not contest that Simon has exhausted his administrative remedies. Doc. 47 at 4 & Exs. B-C; 07 Crim. 474 Doc. 54 at 1. On September 25, 2007, Simon pleaded guilty to one count of access device fraud. Id. Shortly thereafter, in October 2007, Simon was charged with possession of stolen property after driving a motorcycle with a stolen license plate in the Bronx. Id. From October through December 2007, Simon missed scheduled appointments with his supervising pretrial services

officer and the Court issued a warrant for his arrest. Id. at 2-3. On January 3, 2008, Simon failed to appear for sentencing. Id. at 3-4. His sentencing was rescheduled for January 17, 2008 but, when he again failed to appear, he was declared a fugitive. Id. at 4. On March 25, 2008, a Grand Jury indicted Simon with failure to appear. Id. On May 14, 2008, agents went to a basement apartment in the Bronx where they believed Simon resided and found evidence of an additional credit card scheme, including a credit card skimming and encoding device, a credit card embossing machine, high-resolution and thermal dye printers, a scanner, a box of white plastic used to make credit cards and identification cards, computers, hard drives, CDs, DVDs, cellphones, and a large sum of counterfeit United States currency.3 Id. One of the computers contained 1,479 credit card numbers and corresponding

personal information of the cardholders, as well as images of fake identification cards, credit card skimming devices, and guns. Id. at 5. Simon, however, was not in the apartment. Id. Simon was finally rearrested on October 1, 2008 when agents located him at a friend’s apartment in Astoria, Queens. Id. On January 13, 2010, Simon pleaded guilty to one count of failure to appear and another count of access device fraud. Id. at 5. On July 15, 2010, Judge Steven C. Robinson sentenced Simon to 285 months’ incarceration, three years of post-release supervision, and payment of $243,164.66 in restitution.

3 �e agents also found a gun silencer, which Simon contests was actually a prop for his entertainment shows and was not charged. Id. at 4; Doc. 49 at 2-3. Simon is incarcerated at Federal Correctional Institution Allenwood Low (“FCI Allenwood”) and is set to be released on January 23, 2029.4 According to BOP statistics, FCI Allenwood currently has no inmates or staff who have tested positive for COVID-19, no deaths from COVID-19 among inmates or staff, and has just one inmate and one staff member who have recovered from COVID-19.5

Simon now seeks compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act. Doc. 47; U.S. v. Ebbers, 432 F. Supp. 3d 421, 422-23 (S.D.N.Y. 2020). Simon, 48, asserts that he is at a heightened risk of serious illness or death if he contracts COVID-19 because he is immunocompromised and suffers from chronic obstructive asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (“COPD”), and other illnesses. Doc. 47 at 3 & Ex. A. He further argues that his living conditions in an overcrowded correctional facility exacerbate his risk. Id. at 10-11. Finally, he reasons that the non-violent nature of his offenses, his rehabilitative efforts since,6 and his reentry prospects including family support7 warrant a sentence reduction. Id. at 12. �e Government does not contest that he is at an increased risk

from COVID-19 infection,8 but reasons that the circumstances of his offense, his criminal history

4 Find an Inmate, Bureau of Prison (“BOP”), https://www.bop.gov/mobile/find_inmate/byname.jsp#inmate_results (last visited Sept. 28, 2020).

5 COVID-19 Cases, BOP, https://www.bop.gov/coronavirus/ (last visited Sept. 28, 2020).

6 Simon represents that he has taken 70 classes and maintained two jobs while incarcerated. Docs. 47 at 12 & Exs. D-E; 49 at 6. He also volunteers for the BOP Children’s Day events, pays his restitution diligently, and has a list of BOP employees who would serve as character references. Id.

7 Simon cites plans to live with his longtime fiancé and their daughter, to help two of his daughters in school, and to become a social worker and entertainer. Docs. 47 at 12 & Exs. F-G; 49 at 6-7.

8 Curiously, the Government cites Simon’s Body Mass Index of 37.9, which was not argued in his submission, and not any of the respiratory conditions he cited in reaching its conclusion. Id. at 1; Doc. 47 at 19. of fraudulent activity,9 and the eight years remaining on his sentence counsel against compassionate release. 07 Crim. 474 Doc. 54. II. Standard “[A] court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except

pursuant to statute.” U.S. v. Roberts, No. 18 Crim. 528-5 (JMF), 2020 WL 1700032, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2020) (citation omitted). Under § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), a court may reduce a prisoner’s sentence when it finds that there are “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warranting a reduction. District courts may consider “the full slate of extraordinary and compelling reasons that an imprisoned person might bring before them in motions for compassionate release.” United States v. Brooker, --- F.3d ---, 2020 WL 5739712, at *7 (2d. Cir. Sept. 25, 2020) (finding compassionate release applications brought by incarcerated individuals following the First Step Act are not limited by the guidance in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 1B1.13). If the sentencing court finds that “extraordinary and compelling reasons” exist, it “may

reduce the term of imprisonment (and may impose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment), after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Section 3553(a) provides that the Court should consider, inter alia, “the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant.”

9 �e Government notes that Simon was previously convicted of conspiracy to traffic in access device-making equipment, participating in a national credit card conspiracy, forgery, and using fraudulent credit cards. Id. at 2. III. Discussion Simon’s circumstances do not merit compassionate release under § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simon v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Simon v. United States (Simon v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related