Simon v. State
7 So. 3d 600, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2929, 2009 WL 838230
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 997 So. 2d 490 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Fuston v. State, 764 So.2d 779 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that “a defendant is not entitled to successive review on a rule 3.800(a) motion of a specific issue which has already been decided against him.”); Swain v. State, 911 So.2d 140, 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that a defendant is not entitled to successive review of a specific issue decided against him in an earlier post-conviction proceeding even if the question concerns the legality of his sentence).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simon v. State, 7 So. 3d 600, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2929, 2009 WL 838230 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
7 So. 3d 600 (Simon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fuston v. State
764 So. 2d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Swain v. State
911 So. 2d 140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)