Simon v. State

3 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1791, 2009 WL 605370
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 997 So. 2d 490
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2009·No. 3D08-1108·Published

Opinion

Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order revoking the probation of defendant-appellant Martin Simon. The State concedes that at the hearing below, the defendant admitted to a violation of conditions one and thirteen, and the oral pronouncement in this case found a violation of conditions one and thirteen only. The State acknowledges that the revocation order erroneously includes a violation of two other conditions, conditions five and ten, as a basis for revoking probation. Based on the State’s concession, we reverse the revocation order in part and remand with directions to delete the reference to conditions five and ten. See Williams v. State, 764 So.2d 757, 758 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“A written order of revocation must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.”). The defendant need not be present.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simon v. State, 3 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1791, 2009 WL 605370 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

3 So. 3d 453 (Simon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
764 So. 2d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)