Simmons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Simmons v. State

475 S.W.2d 787

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 2, 1972

DocketNo. 44549

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 475 S.W.2d 787 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons v. State, 475 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment, fifteen years imprisonment.

On the trial of the case the appellant was represented by retained counsel of his choice. He entered a plea of not guilty before a jury. The jury assessed appellant’s punishment after finding him guilty.

After conviction, the appellant made affidavit that he was too poor to employ counsel. Counsel was appointed to represent him on appeal. The record contains a transcription of the testimony. The brief of appointed counsel on appeal was filed in the trial court and has been transmitted to this court with the record. The brief filed by appellant’s appointed counsel asserts a familiarity with the record and the law and reaches the conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. However, the record does not reflect that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant as is required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Holder v. State, 469 S.W.2d 184 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Barber v. State, 471 S.W.2d 814 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). This appeal will be abated until the record shows that there has been a compliance with the above cited authorities.

For the reasons stated, the appeal is abated.

Opinion approved by the Court.

MORRISON, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment, fifteen years imprisonment.

On the trial of the case the appellant was represented by retained counsel of his choice. He entered a plea of not guilty before a jury. The jury assessed appellant’s punishment after finding him guilty.

After conviction, the appellant made affidavit that he was too poor to employ counsel. Counsel was appointed to represent him on appeal. The record contains a transcription of the testimony. The brief of appointed counsel on appeal was filed in the trial court and has been transmitted to this court with the record. The brief filed by appellant’s appointed counsel asserts a familiarity with the record and the law and reaches the conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. However, the record does not reflect that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant as is required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Holder v. State, 469 S.W.2d 184 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Barber v. State, 471 S.W.2d 814 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). This appeal will be abated until the record shows that there has been a compliance with the above cited authorities.

For the reasons stated, the appeal is abated.

Opinion approved by the Court.

MORRISON, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 S.W.2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-texcrimapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack