Simmons v. State
This text of 254 S.E.2d 907 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Glenn and Burch Simmons were jointly indicted and convicted of making terroristic threats. Code Ann. § 26-1307. Their sole contention on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient.
The victim testified that the defendants approached him as he and another person were plowing a field and that Glenn Simmons displayed a rifle and threatened to "blow [him] off the tractor” if he did not stop. This testimony was corroborated by the testimony of the person assisting the victim with the plowing. It was also corroborated in part by the victim’s daughter. She stated that she and Glenn Simmons had a confrontation over who owned the land, whereupon Simmons walked over to his truck to get his rifle. She left at that point to call the [590]*590sheriff.
There was no testimony that Burch Simmons made any threats or did anything to support Glenn Simmons’ threats. Held:
"The mere presence of one where a crime is being committed without any further evidence to show participation in it, directly or indirectly, is insufficient upon which to base a conviction. [Cits.]” Jones v. State, 64 Ga. App. 308 (13 SE2d 91) (1941). See also Sweat v. State, 119 Ga. App. 646 (1) (168 SE2d 654)(1969). While the evidence was amply sufficient to convict Glenn Simmons, the defense motion for directed verdict was meritorious and should have been granted as to Burch Simmons.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 S.E.2d 907, 149 Ga. App. 589, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-gactapp-1979.