Jones v. State
This text of 13 S.E.2d 91 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence shows that the officers entered a house where all the devices for operating a lottery were found, and that such devices clearly proved that the crime was in progress when the officers arrived. Then the operation ceased. The defendant was first seen by the officers in a room adjoining the room where the game was operated. This was the only evidence tending to connect her with the offense. This was insufficient. The mere presence of one where a crime is being committed without any further evidence to show participation in it, directly or indirectly, is insufficient upon which to base a conviction. Reese v. State, 157 Ga. 766 (122 S. E. 195); Pirkle v. State, 11 Ga. App. 98 (74 S. E. 709).
2. The court erred in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 S.E.2d 91, 64 Ga. App. 308, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-gactapp-1941.