Simmons v. Simmons
This text of 64 S.E.2d 896 (Simmons v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. If the testimony submitted before the trial judge authorized his order, it should not be disturbed, regardless of any oral opinion that he may have expressed at the conclusion of the hearing'. Jennison v. Jennison, 136 Ga. 202, 207 (71 S. E. 244).
2. The evidence in this case does not show conclusively that the defendant was unable to comply with the judgment awarding alimony, and the order adjudging him in contempt will not be reversed by this court. Greenway v. Greenway, 147 Ga. 503 (94 S. E. 885); Banks v. Banks, 188 Ga. 181 (3 S. E. 2d, 717); Snider v. Snider, 190 Ga. 381 (9 S. E. 2d, 654); Arnold v. Arnold, 195 Ga. 304 (4) (24 S. E. 2d, 12).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 S.E.2d 896, 208 Ga. 51, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-simmons-ga-1951.