Greenway v. Greenway
94 S.E. 885, 147 Ga. 503, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 3
Opinion
Where the 'only issue in a proceeding for contempt because of failure to pay temporary alimony is one of fact, the judgment of the, trial court will not be controlled by this court unless it appears that there is no evidence to support the finding. We can not say that the finding is thus unsupported in this case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Greenway v. Greenway, 94 S.E. 885, 147 Ga. 503, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 3 (Ga. 1918).
94 S.E. 885 (Greenway v. Greenway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shafer v. State
228 S.E.2d 382 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Renfroe v. State of Georgia
121 S.E.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Vogt v. Harris
75 S.E.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
McCullough v. McCullough
69 S.E.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Simmons v. Simmons
64 S.E.2d 896 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Johnson v. Johnson
62 S.E.2d 908 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Townsend v. Townsend
52 S.E.2d 324 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
King v. King
152 S.E. 574 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Greenway v. Greenway
99 S.E. 118 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Crapps v. Crapps
97 S.E. 68 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)