Simmonite v. Kittel

Supreme Court of Florida

Simmonite v. Kittel

159 So. 2d 645

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 1964

DocketNo. 32790

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 So. 2d 645 (Simmonite v. Kittel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmonite v. Kittel, 159 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued and that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and HEWITT, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued and that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and HEWITT, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 2d 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmonite-v-kittel-fla-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack