Simmonite v. Kittel

Supreme Court of Florida

Simmonite v. Kittel

159 So. 2d 645

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 17, 1964·No. No. 32790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued and that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and HEWITT, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued and that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and HEWITT, Circuit Judge, concur.

Simmonite v. Kittel, 159 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

159 So. 2d 645 (Simmonite v. Kittel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related