Schmidt v. Tracey
This text of 159 So. 2d 645 (Schmidt v. Tracey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gertrude S. SCHMIDT, Petitioner,
v.
Raymond R. TRACEY, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Farish & Farish and J.D. Farish, Jr., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Earnest, Pruitt & Schulle and Wallis E. Schulle, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This cause is here on Petition for Writ of Certiorari alleging conflict with Puleo v. Shaw.[1] Although conflict exists we find that inasmuch as the Puleo decision, supra, is reversed by the decision of this Court,[2] the petition herein is denied.
DREW, C.J., and TERRELL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and SEBRING (Retired), JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] 149 So.2d 880 (Fla.App.1st 1963).
[2] Shaw v. Puleo, Fla., 159 So.2d 641.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 So. 2d 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-tracey-fla-1964.