Simeton v. State

764 So. 2d 622, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 296, 2000 WL 36303
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simeton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 734 So. 2d 446
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2000·No. No. 99-1877·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the basis of Rollinson v. State, 743 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We recognize that we certified the question of whether the Prison Releasee Reof-fender Act (PRRA) violates the separation of powers clause of the Florida Constitution in Simmons v. State, 755 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). In addition, -the supreme court has granted review of a decision certifying the question of whether the PRRA violates the Florida Constitution’s separation of powers clause. See Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999).

WARNER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simeton v. State, 764 So. 2d 622, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 296, 2000 WL 36303 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

764 So. 2d 622 (Simeton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. State
755 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Woods v. State
740 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Rollinson v. State
743 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)