Simeton v. State
This text of 764 So. 2d 622 (Simeton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm on the basis of Rollinson v. State, 743 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We recognize that we certified the question of whether the Prison Releasee Reof-fender Act (PRRA) violates the separation of powers clause of the Florida Constitution in Simmons v. State, 755 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). In addition, -the supreme court has granted review of a decision certifying the question of whether the PRRA violates the Florida Constitution’s separation of powers clause. See Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 So. 2d 622, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 296, 2000 WL 36303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simeton-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.