Silverman v. Polidori, No. Cv 89-0435529s (Jan. 4, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Silverman v. Polidori, No. Cv 89-0435529s (Jan. 4, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 719

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJanuary 4, 1991

DocketNo. CV 89-0435529S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 719 (Silverman v. Polidori, No. Cv 89-0435529s (Jan. 4, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverman v. Polidori, No. Cv 89-0435529s (Jan. 4, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 719 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ARTICULATION The owner of the vehicle in question, namely, Abraham Silverman, is not a party to this action. The refusal of the defendants to return the vehicle to the plaintiff does not provide a cause of action to the plaintiff.

"`A plaintiff can recover only by proving that he himself is entitled to prevail on the cause of action alleged. It is not enough that he prove that some other person, not a party to the case, would be entitled to recover on that cause of action'" Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. State,37 Conn. Sup. 50, 69 quoting Wexler Construction Co. v. Housing Authority, 149 Conn. 602, 605. Also see Relly v. Dearington,23 Conn. App. 657, 660.

Thus, while the plaintiff has alleged a cause of action in assault, he has failed to .allege a cause of action against the defendant for failure to return Abraham Silverman is vehicle to him.

FRANCES ALLEN SENIOR JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ARTICULATION The owner of the vehicle in question, namely, Abraham Silverman, is not a party to this action. The refusal of the defendants to return the vehicle to the plaintiff does not provide a cause of action to the plaintiff.

"`A plaintiff can recover only by proving that he himself is entitled to prevail on the cause of action alleged. It is not enough that he prove that some other person, not a party to the case, would be entitled to recover on that cause of action'" Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. State,37 Conn. Sup. 50, 69 quoting Wexler Construction Co. v. Housing Authority, 149 Conn. 602, 605. Also see Relly v. Dearington,23 Conn. App. 657, 660.

Thus, while the plaintiff has alleged a cause of action in assault, he has failed to .allege a cause of action against the defendant for failure to return Abraham Silverman is vehicle to him.

FRANCES ALLEN SENIOR JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-polidori-no-cv-89-0435529s-jan-4-1991-connsuperct-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack