Silverman v. New Rochelle Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silverman v. New Rochelle Hospital

95 A.D.2d 851, 464 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 A.D.2d 851 (Silverman v. New Rochelle Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverman v. New Rochelle Hospital, 95 A.D.2d 851, 464 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tillman, J.), dated December 4, 1982, which denied her motion for a new trial. Matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to hear and report in accordance herewith: The hearing shall be conducted before a Justice other than the Justice who presided at the trial of this matter. In the interim, the appeal shall be held in abeyance. The report shall be filed with all convenient speed. In light of the conflicting allegations in the record concerning whether the Justice who presided at the trial addressed personal comments concerning the trial to the jury before or after they [852]*852completed their deliberations, a hearing is required to resolve the issue. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tillman, J.), dated December 4, 1982, which denied her motion for a new trial. Matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to hear and report in accordance herewith: The hearing shall be conducted before a Justice other than the Justice who presided at the trial of this matter. In the interim, the appeal shall be held in abeyance. The report shall be filed with all convenient speed. In light of the conflicting allegations in the record concerning whether the Justice who presided at the trial addressed personal comments concerning the trial to the jury before or after they [852]*852completed their deliberations, a hearing is required to resolve the issue. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Thompson and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 851, 464 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-new-rochelle-hospital-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack