Silverman v. Feller Lorraine, Inc.
240 A.D. 862
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff came to the building on a personal errand in no way connected with the business of the defendant and was at best a bare licensee to whom the defendant owed no duty of active care. (Poock v. Strahl, 237 App. Div. 842.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, .Carswell and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silverman v. Feller Lorraine, Inc., 240 A.D. 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 862 (Silverman v. Feller Lorraine, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Poock v. Strahl
237 A.D. 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)