Poock v. Strahl

237 A.D. 842
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and complaint dismissed, with costs. The plaintiff, while upon the premises of the defendant, used as a factory for the manufacture of wax, received injuries by stepping into an unguarded vat containing hot water. Whether the status of the plaintiff was that of an invitee or a licensee when he entered upon the premises need not be determined, for his mission, whether personal or in the interest of the defendants, ended when he left the premises at the request of a workman to go on an errand for him. The accident occurred on his return and after an appreciable period of time and in one of the inner rooms of the defendants’ factory. He was, therefore, at the time a bare licensee, and for his injuries the defendants are not liable. (Fabisiak v. Empire Steel Partition Co., Inc., 228 App. Div. 665, affd., 255 N. Y. 593; Cusick v. Adams, 115 id. 55; Barrett v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Co., 188 App. Div. 109; affd., 231 N. Y. 605.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poock v. Strahl, 237 A.D. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

237 A.D. 842 (Poock v. Strahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hogan v. Hess Construction Co.
358 P.2d 755 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1961)
Silverman v. Feller Lorraine, Inc.
240 A.D. 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)