Silva v. American Irving Savings Bank

31 A.D.2d 620, 295 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2654
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 17, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 620 (Silva v. American Irving Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silva v. American Irving Savings Bank, 31 A.D.2d 620, 295 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Judgment herein appealed from, affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. Plaintiff 'did not establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendant bank either in the application of the wax or the maintenance of the floor. Nor did plaintiff show that defendant bank had prior notice or should have known of the alleged dangerous condition created by the waxing of the floor done by the third party defendant pursuant to an employment contract. (Nelson v. Salem Danish Lutheran Church, 270 App. Div. 1030, affd. 296 N. Y. 870; Paddock v. Church of St. Baranabas, 24 A D 2d 716; Elias v. Heller, 23 Misc 2d 201, affd. 16 A D 2d 760.) Concur—'Stevens, J. P., Eager, McGivem and Bastow, JJ.; Gapozzoli, J., 'dissents in the following memorandum: Plaintiff fell on the waxed tile portion of the floor in defendant bank. She testified that, after the fall, she noticed that there were pieces of wax on the floor, that the floor was “ very shine ” and there was a line on the floor about one yard in length, leading to her left heel. She further testified that she observed wax on her heels, shoes, stockings and coat, with most of the wax being on her left heel. This testimony established a prima facie case. (Davis v. Kresge Co., 267 App. Div. 850; Cohen v. Hallbrett Realty Corp., 268 App. Div. 995.) Therefore, the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint and in failing to send the case to the jury for its determination. I dissent and vote to reverse and remand for a new trial. ■ '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linden v. Target Corporation
E.D. New York, 2023
Diehr v. Ass'n for Retarded Citizens
233 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Balaj v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
211 A.D.2d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Katz v. New York Hospital
170 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Thomassen v. J & K Diner, Inc.
152 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Galler v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
468 N.E.2d 691 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Galler v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
99 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Madrid v. City of New York
369 N.E.2d 761 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 620, 295 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silva-v-american-irving-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1968.