Nelson v. Salem Danish Lutheran Church

270 A.D. 1030, 63 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5213
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 1946·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries. Companion action by plaintiff husband for expenses and loss of services. Judgment for plaintiffs reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. Plaintiffs did not establish actionable negligence. The fact that a floor is slippery by reason of its smoothness or polish, in the absence of proof of negligent application of wax or polish, does not give rise to a cause of action. (Kline v. Abraham, 178 N. Y. 377, 380; Abbott v. Richmond County Country Club, 211 App. Div. 231, affd. 240 N. Y. 693.) In the cases upon which plaintiffs rely there was proof of the presence of ridges of soft wax, skid marks or lumps of wax. There is no such proof here. On the contrary,. the proof is that there were no marks on the floor at the place where the plaintiff wife claims she fell and that many others had been using the floor from the time it was refinished, on Friday evening, until the following Monday, when the accident occurred. It further appears that the waxing was done in a competent workmanlike manner, and the condition was not of an unusual or dangerous character. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. Salem Danish Lutheran Church, 270 A.D. 1030, 63 N.Y.S.2d 145, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

270 A.D. 1030 (Nelson v. Salem Danish Lutheran Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aguilar v. Transworld Maintenance Services, Inc.
267 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Fuller v. Powers Funeral Home
214 A.D.2d 1045 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Katz v. New York Hospital
170 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Lowrey v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
162 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Holguin v. Smith's Food King Properties, Inc.
737 P.2d 96 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1987)
Swartz v. Rose
40 A.D.2d 1028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Silva v. American Irving Savings Bank
31 A.D.2d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Mannix v. Matthews
30 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Paddock v. Church of St. Barnabas, Woodlawn & McLean Heights, Inc.
24 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Chernowski v. G. R. Kinney Co.
22 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Nooks v. Saratoga Springs Authority
25 Misc. 2d 1012 (New York State Court of Claims, 1961)
Elias v. Heller
23 Misc. 2d 201 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Kitts v. Shop Rite Foods, Inc.
323 P.2d 282 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1958)
Scott v. United States
158 F. Supp. 810 (N.D. New York, 1957)
Iorio v. Rockland Light & Power Co.
274 A.D. 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)