Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sikora v. State

Sikora v. State

551 So. 2d 613, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2641, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6386, 1989 WL 136079
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 1989
DocketNo. 89-0256
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 551 So. 2d 613 (Sikora v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sikora v. State, 551 So. 2d 613, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2641, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6386, 1989 WL 136079 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

GUNTHER, Judge.

Ronald Sikora appeals his convictions and sentences for one count of grand theft and ten counts of uttering a forged instrument, claiming that double jeopardy bars convictions and sentences for both the grand theft and the uttering charges. The state concedes, pursuant to Monier v. State, 539 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), that the trial court erred in convicting and sentencing Sikora for both uttering a forged instrument and grand theft. Accordingly, Sikora’s conviction and sentence for grand theft are reversed and the case remanded for resentencing.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henderson v. State
583 So. 2d 1030 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Henderson v. State
572 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 So. 2d 613, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2641, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6386, 1989 WL 136079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sikora-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.