Sierra v. JST Transportes S.A. De C.V.

Opinion

September 26, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

LORENZO SIERRA, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:24-CV-30 § JST TRANSPORTES S.A. DE C.V. et § al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Discovery Responses, (Dkt. No. 10), for which United States Magistrate Judge Christopher dos Santos provided a Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 16). In his report and recommendation, Judge dos Santos recommends that the Court grant the Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Discovery Responses with respect to Requests for Admission numbers 33 and 34, and Requests for Production numbers 8, 22, 46, 49, 57, 58, and 59. (Id. at 12). Judge dos Santos further recommends that the Court deny Defendants’ motion with respect to Requests for Admission numbers 14 and 15. (Id.). Finally, Judge dos Santos recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ motion as modified in the recommendation with respect to Request for Production number 1. (Id.). The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), the Court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error. Moore v. Ford Motor Co., 755 F.3d 802, 808 (5th Cir. 2014). Finding none, the Court hereby ADOPTS IN WHOLE the report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Discovery Responses, (Dkt. No. 10), with respect to Requests for Admission numbers 33 and 34, and Requests for Production numbers 8, 22, 46, 49, 57, 58, and 59 is GRANTED and the Defendants’ motion with respect to Requests for Admission numbers 14 and 15 is DENIED. The Court GRANTS AS MODIFIED Defendants’ motion with respect to executing the authorization referenced in Request for Production number 1. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED on September 26, 2024. 4 A. Kazen / | ted States District Vudge

2/2