Sierra Club v. Glickman

Fifth Circuit

Sierra Club v. Glickman

204 F.3d 580

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 2000

Docket97-41274

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 204 F.3d 580 (Sierra Club v. Glickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sierra Club v. Glickman, 204 F.3d 580 (5th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 F.3d 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sierra-club-v-glickman-ca5-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack