Sierra Club v. Glickman

Fifth Circuit

Sierra Club v. Glickman

204 F.3d 580

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2000·No. 97-41274·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Sierra Club v. Glickman, 204 F.3d 580 (5th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

204 F.3d 580 (Sierra Club v. Glickman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related