Sieh v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sieh v. New York City Transit Authority

191 A.D.2d 279, 595 N.Y.S.2d 684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 A.D.2d 279 (Sieh v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sieh v. New York City Transit Authority, 191 A.D.2d 279, 595 N.Y.S.2d 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of the respondent New York City Transit Authority dated July 3, 1991, affirming a Hearing Officer’s decision and order, which found petitioner guilty of fare evasion, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Myriam Altman, JJ, entered on or about December 11, 1991), dismissed, without costs.

The Hearing Officer found that the petitioner’s defenses of alibi and mistaken identity were not credible. A review of the record before the Hearing Officer establishes that the decision is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Reape v Gunn, 154 AD2d 682, lv denied 75 NY2d 707, appeal dismissed 75 NY2d 1004).

We have considered the remaining arguments, and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of the respondent New York City Transit Authority dated July 3, 1991, affirming a Hearing Officer’s decision and order, which found petitioner guilty of fare evasion, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Myriam Altman, JJ, entered on or about December 11, 1991), dismissed, without costs.

The Hearing Officer found that the petitioner’s defenses of alibi and mistaken identity were not credible. A review of the record before the Hearing Officer establishes that the decision is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Reape v Gunn, 154 AD2d 682, lv denied 75 NY2d 707, appeal dismissed 75 NY2d 1004).

We have considered the remaining arguments, and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 279, 595 N.Y.S.2d 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sieh-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack