Jeremie v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jeremie v. New York City Transit Authority

217 A.D.2d 583, 628 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 583 (Jeremie v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeremie v. New York City Transit Authority, 217 A.D.2d 583, 628 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the respondent New York City Transit Authority, Transit Adjudication Bureau, both dated February 11, 1993, which denied the petitioner’s requests to vacate default judgments issued by the respondent upon findings that the petitioner had on two different occasions entered the premises of the New York City Transit Authority without paying his fare, and imposed fines.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The Hearing Officer found that the petitioner’s defense of mistaken identity was not credible and that the petitioner failed to establish reasonable cause for his defaults. A review of the record establishes that the determinations were supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Reape v Gunn, 154 AD2d 682; Matter of Sieh v New York City Tr. Auth., 191 AD2d 279). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the respondent New York City Transit Authority, Transit Adjudication Bureau, both dated February 11, 1993, which denied the petitioner’s requests to vacate default judgments issued by the respondent upon findings that the petitioner had on two different occasions entered the premises of the New York City Transit Authority without paying his fare, and imposed fines.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The Hearing Officer found that the petitioner’s defense of mistaken identity was not credible and that the petitioner failed to establish reasonable cause for his defaults. A review of the record establishes that the determinations were supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Reape v Gunn, 154 AD2d 682; Matter of Sieh v New York City Tr. Auth., 191 AD2d 279). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 583, 628 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeremie-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack