Siebert v. Allen

Eleventh Circuit

Siebert v. Allen

534 F.3d 1367, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4023, 2008 WL 2735986

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 25, 2008·No. No. 06-11841·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. See Allen v. Siebert, 552 U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2, 169 L.Ed.2d 329 (2007), rev’g Siebert v. Allen, 480 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir.2007). In accordance therewith, we hereby AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Siebert’s federal habeas petition as be[1368] ing untimely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. See Allen v. Siebert, 552 U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2, 169 L.Ed.2d 329 (2007), rev’g Siebert v. Allen, 480 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir.2007). In accordance therewith, we hereby AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Siebert’s federal habeas petition as be[1368] ing untimely filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

AFFIRMED.

Siebert v. Allen, 534 F.3d 1367, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4023, 2008 WL 2735986 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

534 F.3d 1367 (Siebert v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related