Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 2016·No. 01-15-00762-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Sidney Daunell Darrell v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00762-CR

Trial court case number: 1421932

Trial court: 248th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above- referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). We grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. Appellant also has filed a separate motion for an extension of time of 180 days within which to file a response to counsel’s Anders brief. We grant the motion in part. Appellant’s response to his appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 60 days of the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 2, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State (Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)