Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State
This text of Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State (Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Sidney Daunell Darrell v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-15-00762-CR
Trial court case number: 1421932
Trial court: 248th District Court of Harris County
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above-referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel has not, however, filed a letter in accordance with Kelly v. State, “to (1) notify his client of the motion to withdraw and the accompanying Anders brief, providing him with a copy of each, (2) inform him of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the record preparatory to filing that response, (3) inform him of his pro se right to seek discretionary review should the court of appeals declare his appeal frivolous,” and (4) “notify his client that, should he wish to exercise his right to review the appellate record in preparing to file a response to the Anders brief, he should immediately file a motion for pro se access to the appellate record with the applicable court of appeals,” which letter includes “a form motion . . ., lacking only the appellant’s signature and the date, . . . inform[ing] the appellant that, in order to effectuate his right to review the appellate record pro se, should he choose to invoke it, he must sign and date the motion and send it on to the court of appeals within ten days of the date of the letter from appellate counsel.” 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Accordingly, we order appellant’s appointed counsel, Kyle R. Sampson, to send a letter and a form motion, such as the motion attached to this order, to the appellant in accordance with Kelly. Id. We further order appellant’s appointed counsel to notify us, in writing, “that he has (1) informed the appellant of the motion to withdraw and attendant Anders brief, (2) provided the appellant with the requisite copies while notifying him of his various pro se rights, and (3) supplied him with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record.” Id. at 320. Counsel shall send the required letter to his client and shall file the required notice with the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings the Court
Date: January 14, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sidney Daunell Darrell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sidney-daunell-darrell-v-state-texapp-2016.